Disability adjustments scenarios
Download this document as a PDF
Contents
- Introduction
- Extra time and Rest breaks
- Electronic Format (Interactive PDF)
- Reading to students
- Vision impairments and/or poor motor sensory control
- Learning disabilities
- Fatigue inducing conditions and/or attention disorders
- Severe speech and/or physical impairment
- Temporary Injuries/Medical conditions
- Hearing disabilities
- Fatigue inducing conditions and/or attention disorders
- Learning and/or intellectual disabilities/behavioural difficulties
- References
Introduction
This document contains a number of scenarios that provide examples of how the adjustments outlined in your NAPLAN Handbook for Principals and the National Protocols for Test Administration may be applied. The adjusments permitted in the NAPLAN National Protocols for Test Administration include:
- Extra time
- Rest breaks
- Assistive technology
- Large print
- Black and white print format
- Screen reader
- Braille
- Coloured overlays
- Signed support
- Use of a scribe
- Use of a support person
- Electronic format (Interactive PDF)
The scenarios that follow are examples only, and are to be used only as a guide in circumstances with students that may be in a similar situation. The students at your school may be in a different situation to those outlined in these scenarios and require different adjustments and provisions. Teachers and schools are in the best position to determine the needs of individual students, in consultation with students and their parents/carers.
Adjusments should generally reflect the kind of support and assistance provided in the classroom in order for students to show what they know and can do. However, some support that is used in classroom learning and assessment is not appropriate in the NAPLAN assessment setting. If some methods students use in their classroom based assessment are not permitted in the NAPLAN assessment setting, adequate time and support should be provided to these students to enable them to adjust to the NAPLAN assessment conditions accordingly.
The adjusments for NAPLAN are permitted in line with theDisability Discrimination Act (1992), and Disability Standards for Education (2005), which emphasise that reasonable adjustments must be made to help ensure students with disability are able to access the tests wherever possible. The Disability Standards for Education(2005), state that the education provider:
- must take reasonable steps to ensure that the student is able to participate in the courses or programs provided by the educational institution, and use the facilities and services provided by it, on the same basis as a student without disability, and without experiencing discrimination
- must decide whether an adjustment is necessary to ensure that the student is able to participate in the courses or programs provided by the educational institution, and use the facilities and services provided by it, on the same basis as a student without disability
The Disability Standards for Education (2005) also state that when assessing whether a particular adjustment for a student is reasonable, regard should be given to all the relevant circumstances and interests, including:
- the student's disability
- the views of the student or the student's associate
- the effect of the adjustment on the student, including the effect on the student's:
- ability to achieve learning outcomes
- ability to participate in courses or programs
- independence
- the effect of the proposed adjustment on anyone else affected, including the education provider, staff and other students
- the costs and benefits of making the adjustments
Please check with your state or territory Test Administration Authority (TAA) if in doubt.
Further guidance is provided below on the following four adjusments outlined in the National Protocols for Test Administration - extra time, rest breaks and the interactive PDF. Information about reading to students is also provided.
Extra time and Rest breaks
Teachers and schools are best placed to determine how many minutes of extra time a student should have to take the test. Generally, it is recommended that no more than 5 minutes of extra time per half hour of test time be granted, however in some cases it is recommended up to an additional 50% of published test time be provided. In any case, the school is best placed to make a final decision based on the specific circumstances of the student in question, in line with TAA requirements.
Where relevant, rest breaks can be used as an alternative to extra time to avoid student fatigue, although there will be instances where both (ie extra time and rest breaks) are necessary.
Braille users: The logistics of using Braille/Brailler may warrant the provision of some extra time for all students accessing the test in this manner, regardless of their proficiency in this medium. For example, students who use Braille are also required to use two large Braille books in the Reading test (ie the reading magazine and question book) working between the two at the same time (eg taking their fingers off one book to refer to the other and finding their place in each). Students using Braille are required to respond on their Brailler and then tactually find their place for the next question.
Electronic format (Interactive PDF)
- The interactive PDF enables students to answer questions on screen by clicking a radio button or typing their answer in a text box.
- In order to be eligible to use the PDFs, students must currently use assistive technology (ie a computer) as part of their usual adjustments when participating in classroom assessments and not be able to access the tests through any of the other adjustments available.
- The interative PDF tests will contain the same content as those undertaken by other students. The test results of students deemed eligible to use the PDFs will be included as part of the official cohort of students undertaking the tests; and these students will be provided with a NAPLAN student report.
- Schools may obtain a sample NAPLAN interactive PDF test from the relevant Test Administration Authority to enable students to familiarise themselves with the medium in preparation for the tests.
Reading to students
Reading to students is a provision available to all students, in line with the following (as taken from the NAPLAN National Protocols for Test Administration):
Test Administrators are permitted to:
- Read test instructions
- Read Writing instructions
- Read practice questions
- Read the Writing stimulus
- Read Numeracy questions (but not numbers or symbols)
The literacy demands of the test should not exclude a student from accessing the Numeracy tests, however it is not intended that a teacher lead the class through the Numeracy test, question by question, unless the literacy standard of the whole class is a barrier to access.
Test Administrators are not permitted to:
- Read numbers or symbols
- Interpret diagrams or rephrase questions
- Read questions, multiple choice distracters or stimulus material in the Reading or Language Conventions tests
- Paraphrase, interpret or give hints about questions or texts
- Engage a parent or student to assist a student to read permitted sections of the tests (the reader should be a regular support person)
The receipt of adjustments is dependent on the resources available in each school, state and/or territory.
***
*To protect the privacy of individuals, names have been changed and scenarios conflated or constructed. Any resemblance to actual students is unintentional and purely coincidental.
***
This document was prepared following expert advice and consultation with state and territory jurisdictional representatives. It will be reviewed from time to time as necessary.
Vision impairments and/or poor motor sensory control
SCENARIO A
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
As a Braille user, extra time is relevant in Sam's case. Sam's school principal, in discussions with him and his parents, decided an extra 10 minutes per half hour of the Writing test was appropriate, 15 minutes extra for the Language Conventions and Reading tests and 20 minutes extra for the Numeracy test. |
SCENARIO B
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
In this case, Antonia's principal determined that up to 5 minutes of extra time per half hour of the tests was appropriate for Antonia to use when participating in the writing test using a Scribe. (For example, if Antonia requests the Scribe read back her words for the sake of continuity during the writing test etc). Antonia used large print for the other tests. |
SCENARIO C
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
Text prediction software is not permitted in the NAPLAN assessment setting. Rosalia is eligible to use the interactive PDF. The interactive PDF is available to students who would not otherwise be able to access the tests. In this case, it was determined that up to 15 minutes of rest time per half hour of the tests was appropriate if Rosalia needed this because of the fatigue she suffers due to her impairment. Up to 15 minutes of extra time per half hour of the tests was also made available to Rosalia only if she required it (too much extra time can prolong fatigue), in recognition of the severity of her impairment and how long it may take her to complete the tests. This time also accounted for differences between her learning accommodations and the adjusments permissible for NAPLAN. |
SCENARIO D
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
James regularly uses a computer for producing and participating in his classroom learning and assessment. James may use a computer to type his answer to the writing test and screen magnification software ('zoom text') to review his response. James can access the remaining tests via large print. In this case, it was determined that up to 5 minutes of extra time per half hour of the tests be made available to James because of the time he may require to read the large print materials. |
SCENARIO E
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
Luke is eligible to access the interactive PDF. The interactive PDF is available to students who would not otherwise be able to access the tests. It was determined that up to 10 minutes extra time per half hour of the tests was appropriate due to the difficulties and related time taken Luke requires to control his eye movement. Five minute rest breaks were permitted per half hour of the test to account for the emotional stress Luke may experience taking a timed test. |
SCENARIO F
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
Because Jessica is adept at accessing her work in large print, and has adapted well to this provision in the classroom, it was unlikely that extra time would be necessary for her to complete the tests. However, due to the logistics involved in reading large print, 5 minutes of extra time per half hour of the test was made available to Jessica if she needed it. |
The receipt of adjusments is dependent on the resources available in each school, state and/or territory.
Learning disabilities
SCENARIO G
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
In this case, it was determined that Calvin be permitted up to 5 minutes of rest breaks per half hour of the Writing test to assist with any potential frustrations (which he has regularly displayed when participating in classroom learning and assessment). He was permitted to use a support person to assist in a manner the school deemed appropriate eg shading in the 'answer bubbles' (at his direction) for the other tests. Note: not all students with Asperger Syndrome will have the difficulties identified above. |
The receipt of adjusments is dependent on the resources available in each school, state and/or territory.
Fatigue inducing conditions and/or attention disorders
SCENARIO H
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
Sherab is eligible to use the interactive PDF. The interactive PDF is available to students who would not otherwise be able to access the tests. In this case, it was determined that rest breaks of up to 15 minutes in total be granted per test as required, due to the fatigue Sherab experiences. Extra time was not deemed appropriate as this simply prolonged Sherab's fatigue. |
SCENARIO I
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
A Scribe used for the writing test can also provide support to a student in the other tests. For example, a Scribe may shade in the 'answer bubbles' for the other tests (at students direction). In this case, it was determined that a rest break of up to 10 minutes per half hour of the test be made available to Christopher because of his experiences of chronic fatigue and difficulties maintaining concentration. |
The receipt of adjusments is dependent on the resources available in each school, state and/or territory.
Severe speech and/or physical impairment
SCENARIO J
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
Jenni's school requested access to the different tests in different ways to replicate Jenni's usual access to learning and assessment in the classroom; ie viewing the reading stimulus in large-print, while accessing the questions via the interactive PDF. (Jenni is eligible to use the interactive PDF). In the NAPLAN tests, the use of multimedia tools/software that enables students to write with whole words, phrases etc are not permitted. To account for the subsequent adjustments Jenni is required to make in light of this, and to accommodate the logistics involved in accessing the tests via large print and on screen, 10 minutes of extra time per half hour was deemed appropriate for Jenni to use in the writing test, and up to 20 minutes extra time per half hour for the other tests. Jenni was also allowed rest breaks as and when she required (up to 15 minutes in total per test). |
The receipt of adjusments is dependent on the resources available in each school, state and/or territory
Temporary Injuries/Medical conditions
SCENARIO K
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
Sophie can use a computer to complete her response to the writing test. A support person can be used for the language conventions, reading and numeracy tests (eg to shade in bubbles or write a short response or answer dictated by the student). A support person either has to be a teacher or other person as engaged by the school (cannot be a parent of the student or another student), and should be familiar to the student. If no alternative adjusment is appropriate the student must be marked absent from the test session. |
SCENARIO L
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
In this case, it was determined at the school that approximately 10-15 minutes of rest break time in total could be used by Nicktarios per test, as and when needed. |
SCENARIO M
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
The digital/electronic memory aid strategies etc used by William in classroom learning and assessment are not permitted in the NAPLAN tests. In William's case, it was determined that 10 minutes of rest breaks and 10 minutes of extra time per half hour of the test was appropriate due to both the mental and physical fatigue he experiences and the time it takes for him to process information due to his injury. |
The receipt of adjusments is dependent on the resources available in each school, state and/or territory.
Hearing disabilities
SCENARIO N
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
Signing is permitted for sections of the test that can be read to all students (see 'reading to students'). There are no verbal components to the tests and as John has no difficulties reading or writing, and is fluent in Auslan, the provision of extra time was deemed not applicable in this case. In other cases extra time may be required depending on the fluency in oral signage of the teacher and student in question, and whether the student requires the test instructions to be repeated throughout the test. |
SCENARIO O
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
Rest breaks may be applicable in this case if Shari is experiencing an episode of otitis media during the tests. In this case, Shari's school determined that 10 minutes of rest breaks per half hour of the test was appropriate because of Shari's fluctuating condition and related pain. If Shari were to experience an acute episode of otitis media during the tests, it may be more appropriate to allow her to sit it during a catch-up session, or to mark her absent from the test session. As literacy is an issue, Shari is able to have all the test instructions and Numeracy questions read to her, see 'reading to students'. |
The receipt of adjusments is dependent on the resources available in each school, state and/or territory.
Fatigue inducing conditions and/or attention disorders
SCENARIO P
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
The provision of scaffolds for writing etc, are not permitted in the NAPLAN assessment setting. In this case, it was determined at the school that up to 5 minutes of extra time per half hour of the tests was appropriate because of the difficulties Samantha contends with in assessment tasks due to the effects of her Irlen Syndrome. Samantha is able to have all the test instructions and questions read to her see 'reading to students'. |
SCENARIO Q
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
In this case, it was determined at the school that up to 5 minutes of rest time per half hour of the tests was appropriate. This reflects Benjamin's usual flexible practices in the classroom which take into account for his difficulties concentrating. |
The receipt of adjusments is dependent on the resources available in each school, state and/or territory.
Learning and/or intellectual disabilities/behavioural difficulties
SCENARIO R
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
Good management of the test environment will ensure that Mia is able to hear instructions. |
SCENARIO S
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
|
|
NOTES |
The provision of writing scaffolds or sentence starters/word banks are not permitted in the NAPLAN assessment setting. In this case, it was determined that up to 10 minutes of extra time per half hour of the tests was appropriate because of Cheryl's regular need for extra time to comprehend instructions and complete tasks. Cheryl is able to have all the test instructions and Numeracy questions read to her, see 'reading to students'. |
SCENARIO T
|
The situation |
|
|
Key points to consider |
|
|
Adjusments relevant/ applicable? |
NONE (see notes below) |
|
NOTES |
Students enrolled in multiple settings should be encouraged to participate in NAPLAN testing in the setting where they are the most settled and able to manage their behaviour. They need to understand that the teacher support is limited to the constraints of the testing regime. Shane's access to the test is not compromised by his situation, however good management of the test setting will be essential to his performance. Separate supervision may be required if teachers deem Shane's behaviour to be inconsiderate of other students leading up to/during the test. |
References
- Windsor, Richard L., Windsor and Laura, K., Understanding Nystagmua, 2000.
- Hodge, T and Downie, J., Together we are heard: Effectiveness of daily 'language' groups in a community preschool, Nursing and Health Sciences, Volume 6, no.2, 2004
- Moeller, M., Tomblin, J., Yoshinaga-Itano C., Connor, C., and Jerger, S., Current State of Knowledge: Language and Literacy of Children with Hearing Impairment, Ear and Hearing, Volume: 28, no. 6, 2007.



